Guidelines and Suggestions for Implementing the Conciliar Declaration Nostra Aetate (n. 4),
by the Vatican Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews
January 1975
The Declaration Nostra Aetate, issued by the Second Vatican Council on 28
October, 1965, "On the relationship of the Church to Non-Christian Religions"
(n.4), marks an important milestone in the history of Jewish-Christian relations.
Moreover, the step taken by the Council finds its historical setting in circumstances
deeply affected by the memory of the persecution and massacre of Jews which took place in
Europe just before and during the Second World War.
Although Christianity sprang from Judaism, taking from it certain essential elements of
its faith and divine worship, the gap dividing them was deepened more and more, to such an
extent that Christian and Jew hardly knew each other.
After two thousand years, too often marked by mutual ignorance and frequent
confrontation, the Declaration provides an opportunity to open or to continue a dialogue
with a view to better mutual understanding. Over the past nine years, many steps in this
direction have been taken in various countries. As a result, it is easier to define the
conditions under which a new relationship between Jews and Christians may be worked out and
developed. This seems the right moment to propose, following the guidelines of the Council,
some concrete suggestions born of experience, hoping that they will help to bring into
actual existence in the life of the Church the intentions expressed in the conciliar
document.
While referring the reader back to this document, we may simply restate here that the
spiritual bonds and historical links binding the Church to Judaism condemn (as opposed to
the very spirit of Christianity) all forms of anti-semitism and discrimination, which in any
case the dignity of the human person alone would suffice to condemn. Further still, these
links and relationships render obligatory a better mutual understanding and renewed mutual
esteem. On the practical level in particular, Christians must therefore strive to acquire a
better knowledge of the basic components of the religious tradition of Judaism; they must
strive to learn by what essential traits the Jews define themselves in the light of their
own religious experience.
With due respect for such matters of principle, we simply propose some first practical
applications in different essential areas of the Church's life, with a view to launching or
developing sound relations between Catholics and their Jewish brothers.
DIALOGUE
To tell the truth, such relations as there have been between Jew and Christian have
scarcely ever risen above the level of monologue. From now on, real dialogue must be
established.
Dialogue presupposes that each side wishes to know the other, and wishes to increase and
deepen its knowledge of the other. It constitutes a particularly suitable means of favoring
a better mutual knowledge and, especially in the case of dialogue between Jews and
Christians, of probing the riches of one's own tradition. Dialogue demands respect for the
other as he is; above all, respect for his faith and his religious convictions.
In virtue of her divine mission, and her very nature, the Church must preach Jesus Christ
to the world (, n. 2). Lest the witness of Catholics to Jesus Christ should give offence to
Jews, they must take care to live and spread their Christian faith while maintaining the
strictest respect for religious liberty in line with the teaching of the Second Vatican
Council (Declaration ). They will likewise strive to understand the difficulties which arise
for the Jewish soul -- rightly imbued with an extremely high, pure notion of the divine
transcendence -- when faced with the mystery of the incarnate Word.
While it is true that a widespread air of suspicion, inspired by an unfortunate past, is
still dominant in this particular area, Christians, for their part, will be able to see to
what extent the responsibility is theirs and deduce practical conclusions for the future.
In addition to friendly talks, competent people will be encouraged to meet and to study
together the many problems deriving from the fundamental convictions of Judaism and of
Christianity. In order not to hurt (even involuntarily) those taking part, it will be vital
to guarantee, not only tact, but a great openness of spirit and diffidence with respect to
one's own prejudices.
In whatever circumstances as shall prove possible and mutually acceptable, one might
encourage a common meeting in the presence of God, in prayer and silent meditation -- a
highly efficacious way of finding that humility, that openness of heart and mind, necessary
prerequisites for a deep knowledge of oneself and of others. In particular, that will be
done in conjunction with great causes such as the struggle for peace and justice.
LITURGY
The existing links between the Christian liturgy and the Jewish liturgy will be borne in
mind. The idea of a living community in the service of God, and in the service of men for
the love of God, such as it is realized in the liturgy, is just as characteristic of the
Jewish liturgy as it is of the Christian one. To improve Jewish-Christian relations, it is
important to take cognizance of those common elements of the liturgical life (formulas,
feasts, rites, etc.) in which the Bible holds an essential place.
An effort will be made to acquire a better understanding of whatever in the Old Testament
retains its own perpetual value (cf. , n. 14-15), since that has not been cancelled by the
later interpretations of the New Testament. Rather, the New Testament brings out the full
meaning of the Old, while both Old and New illumine and explain each other (cf. IBID. , n.
16). This is all the more important since liturgical reform is now bringing the text of the
Old Testament ever more frequently to the attention of Christians.
When commenting on biblical texts, emphasis will be laid on the continuity of our faith
with that of the earlier Covenant, in the perspective of the promises, without minimizing
those elements of Christianity which are original. We believe that those promises were
fulfilled with the first coming of Christ. But it is none the less true that we still await
their perfect fulfilment in his glorious return at the end of time.
With respect to liturgical readings, care will be taken to see that homilies based on
them will not distort their meaning, especially when it is a question of passages which seem
to show the Jewish people as such in an unfavorable light. Efforts will be made so to
instruct the Christian people that they will understand the true interpretation of all the
texts and their meaning for the contemporary believer.
Commissions entrusted with the task of liturgical translation will pay particular
attention to the way in which they express those phrases and passages which Christians, if
not well informed, might misunderstand because of prejudice. Obviously, one cannot alter the
text of the Bible. The point is that, with a version destined for liturgical use, there
should be an overriding preoccupation to bring out explicitly the meaning of a text,
[1] while taking scriptural studies into account.
The preceding remarks also apply to introductions to biblical readings, to the Prayer of
the Faithful, and to commentaries printed in missals used by the laity.
TEACHING AND EDUCATION
Although there is still a great deal of work to be done, a better understanding of
Judaism itself and its relationship to Christianity has been achieved in recent years thanks
to the teaching of the Church, the study and research of scholars, and also to the beginning
of dialogue. In this respect, the following facts deserve to be recalled.
It is the same God, "inspirer and author of the books of both Testaments," (Dei
Verbum, n. 16), who speaks both in the old and new Covenants.
Judaism in the time of Christ and the Apostles was a complex reality, embracing many
different trends, many spiritual, religious, social and cultural values.
The Old Testament and the Jewish tradition founded upon it must not be set against the
New Testament in such a way that the former seems to constitute a religion of only justice,
fear and legalism, with no appeal to the love of God and neighbor (cf. Deut. 6:5, Lev.
19:18, Matt. 22:34- 40).
Jesus was born of the Jewish people, as were his Apostles and a large number of his first
disciples. When he revealed himself as the Messiah and Son of God (cf. Mt. 16:16), the
bearer of the new Gospel messages, he did so as the fulfilment and perfection of the earlier
Revelation. And, although his teaching had a profoundly new character, Christ nevertheless,
in many instances, took his stand on the teaching of the Old Testament. The New Testament is
profoundly marked by its relation to the Old. As the Second Vatican Council declared:
"God, the inspirer and author of the books of both Testaments, wisely arranged that the
New Testament be hidden in the Old and the Old be made manifest in the New" (Dei
Verbum, n. 16). Jesus also used teaching methods similar to those employed by the rabbis of
his time.
With regard to the trial and death of Jesus, the Council recalled that "what
happened in his passion cannot be blamed upon all the Jews then living, without distinction,
nor upon the Jews of today" (n. 4).
The history of Judaism did not end with the destruction of Jerusalem, but rather went on
to develop a religious tradition. And, although we believe that the importance and meaning
of that tradition were deeply affected by the coming of Christ, it is still nonetheless rich
in religious values.
With the prophets and the apostle Paul, "the Church awaits the day, known to God
alone, on which all peoples will address the Lord in a single voice and 'serve him with one
accord" (Soph. 3:9), (n. 4).
Information concerning these questions is important at all levels of Christian
instruction and education. Among sources of information, special attention should be paid to
the following:
catechisms and religious textbooks history books the mass-media (press, radio, cinema, television)
The effective use of these means presupposes the thorough formation of instructors and
educators in training schools, seminaries and universities.
Research into the problems bearing on Judaism and Jewish-Christian relations will be
encouraged among specialists, particularly in the fields of exegesis, theology, history and
sociology. Higher institutions of Catholic research, in association if possible with other
similar Christian institutions and experts, are invited to contribute to the solution of
such problems. Wherever possible, chairs of Jewish studies will be created, and
collaboration with Jewish scholars encouraged.
JOINT SOCIAL ACTION
Jewish and Christian tradition, founded on the Word of God, is aware of the value of the
human person, the image of God. Love of the same God must show itself in effective action
for the good of mankind. In the spirit of the prophets, Jews and Christians will work
together, seeking social justice and peace at every level -- local, national and
international.
At the same time, such collaboration can do much to foster mutual understanding and
esteem.
CONCLUSION
The Second Vatican Council has pointed out the path to follow in promoting deep
fellowship between Jews and Christians. But there is still a long road ahead.
The problem of Jewish-Christian relations concerns the Church as such, since it is when
"pondering her own mystery" that she encounters the mystery of Israel. Therefore,
even in areas where no Jewish communities exist, this remains an important problem. There is
also an ecumenical aspect to the question: the very return of Christians to the sources and
origins of their faith, grafted on to the earlier Covenant, helps the search for unity in
Christ, the cornerstone.
In this field, the bishops will know what best to do on the pastoral level, within the
general disciplinary framework of the Church and in line with the common teaching of her
magisterium. For example, they will create some suitable commissions or secretariats on a
national or regional level, or appoint some competent person to promote the implementation
of the conciliar directives and the suggestions made above.
On 22 October, 1974, the Holy Father instituted for the universal Church this Commission
for Religious Relations with the Jews, joined to the Secretariat for Promoting Christian
Unity. This special Commission, created to encourage and foster religious relations between
Jews and Catholics -- and to do so eventually in collaboration with other Christians -- will
be, within the limits of its competence, at the service of all interested organizations,
providing information for them, and helping them to pursue their task in conformity with the
instructions of the Holy See.
The Commission wishes to develop this collaboration in order to implement, correctly and
effectively, the express intentions of the Council.
FOOTNOTES
(The English text was issued by the Commission. An Italian text was published in L'OSSERVATORE Romano, 4 Jan. 1975.)
- Thus the formula "the Jews," in St. John, sometimes
according to the context means "the leaders of the Jews," or "the
adversaries of Jesus," terms which express better the thought of the evangelist and
avoid appearing to arraign the Jewish people as such. Another example is the use of the
words "pharisee" and "pharisaism," which have taken on a largely
pejorative meaning.

|